AEM vs North Dakota – Dealer’s Response to AEM Complaint
Case 1:17-cv-00151-DLH-CSM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
Member Link:
Intervenor
North Dakota Implement Dealers Association's Answers to AEM Complaint
Wold Johnson, P.C. – Benjamin Thomas
Bass Sox Mercer – Jason T. Allen (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for NDIDA
North Dakota Implement Dealers Association (hereinafter, “NDIDA”), pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting NDIDA’s Motion to Intervene, hereby submits this Answer to the Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
(In reply to AEM complaint, line-by-ling NDIDA either states that alligations constitute legal conclusions which require no response, or state that text of Senate Bill 2289 speak for themselves, and to the extent a further response is deemed required, NDIDA denies allegations.)