Farm Bureau | 婷婷激情五月天 Our Members Bring Choice, Value & Innovation to Agriculture Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:09:51 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.4 /wp-content/uploads/2023/09/fema-favicon-75x75.png Farm Bureau | 婷婷激情五月天 32 32 AFBF Welcomes Supreme Court Decision to Hear Prop 12 Case /news/afbf-welcomes-supreme-court-decision-to-hear-prop-12-case/ Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:09:50 +0000 /?p=17516 American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) President Zippy Duvall has commented on the U.S. Supreme Court decision to hear the case against California鈥檚 Proposition 12 filed by AFBF and the National Pork Producers Council. The state law seeks to ban the sale of pork from hogs that don鈥檛 meet the state鈥檚 arbitrary production standards, even if the pork was raised on farms outside of California.

鈥淎FBF is pleased with the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision to consider the constitutionality of California鈥檚 law imposing arbitrary requirements on farmers well outside its borders. 聽聽We share California鈥檚 goal of ensuring animals are well cared for, but Prop 12 fails to advance that goal. We look forward to presenting the facts to the Court, including how Prop 12 hamstrings farmers鈥 efforts to provide a safe environment for their animals, while harming small family farms and raising pork prices across the country. One state鈥檚 misguided law should not dictate farming practices for an entire nation.鈥

Source:

]]>
Federal Court Sends Illegal Water Rule Back to EPA /featured-small/federal-court-sends-illegal-water-rule-back-to-epa/ Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:24:56 +0000 /?p=7956 A federal court says the 2015 Waters of the United States rule is unlawful under the Clean Water Act because of its 鈥渧ast expansion of jurisdiction over waters and land traditionally within the states鈥 regulatory authority.鈥 The court for the Southern District of Georgia found the agency overstepped not just the CWA, but also the Administrative Procedure Act, which lays out the most basic rules governing how agencies may propose and establish federal regulations. The Georgia court kept in place a preliminary injunction preventing the rule from becoming effective in the 11 states involved with the lawsuit while the Environmental Protection Agency finalizes its own repeal and replacement of the 2015 rule.

The ruling was a victory not just for the plaintiff states, but a broad coalition of more than a dozen private sector groups, including the American Farm Bureau Federation.

鈥淭he court ruling is clear affirmation of exactly what we have been saying for the past five years,鈥 AFBF General Counsel Ellen Steen said. 鈥淭he EPA badly misread Supreme Court precedent. It encroached on the traditional powers of the states and simply ignored basic principles of the Administrative Procedure Act when it issued this unlawful regulation. The court found fault with the EPA鈥檚 interpretation of some of the most basic principles of the CWA, most importantly which waters the federal government may regulate, and which waters must be left to states and municipalities.鈥

Jurists repeatedly criticized the EPA鈥檚 handling of the rulemaking, in particular its interpretation of the Supreme Court鈥檚 鈥淩apanos鈥 decision, which laid out guidelines for determining where federal jurisdiction begins and ends.

The American Farm Bureau Federation, in partnership with a coalition of groups, urges repeal and replacement of the 2015 rule to ensure clean water and clear rules. 

]]>